Alex330 Geschrieben 8. Juli 2004 Melden Geschrieben 8. Juli 2004 Mit Gruß vom Alex Kurze inhaltliche Zusammefassung: Boeing muss das Design der neuen 7E7 überdenken, nachdem Kritik von Okögruppen und Airlines laut geworden ist. Boeing möchte mit der 7E7 eine wiedererkennbare Marke aufbauen und "den Zauber des Fliegens" zurückbringen, daher das besondere Aussehen mit der spitzen Nase und dem geschwungenen Leitwerk. Es scheint aber, dass gerade diese Merkmale für erhöhten Treibstoffverbrauch sorgen. First Choice, einer der Launch Customers, übt jetzt Durck auf Boeing aus, das Aussehen des Flugzeugs noch zu verändern. Boeing scheint bereit zu sein, das Design zu überdenken, wenn die Airlines dies wollen. Vor allem das Leitwerk könnte noch Änderungen erfahren. DREAMLINER'S FUEL NIGHTMARE FOR BOEING 8 July 2004 / The Times By Ben Webster Boeing is being forced to rethink the design of its new jet after admitting that its distinctive shape would waste fuel. The company had claimed that the 7E7 Dreamliner, expected to make its maiden flight in 2007, would be the most eye-catching aircraft in the skies. But First Choice, the holiday company that yesterday revealed it was ordering six Dreamliners, said that it would be pressing Boeing to redesign the plane. Chris Browne, managing director of First Choice, said that passengers did not care what the plane looked like as long as fares were cheap and the interior was comfortable. She added: "Aerodynamics are far more important than the appearance. While it might be nice to look different, the key issue is to reduce fuel consumption." As a launch customer, First Choice has the right to negotiate with Boeing over the design of the Dreamliner. The present design has an elongated nose and a tail fin that curves out of the fuselage rather than jutting upwards. It looks sleeker than existing snub nosed aircraft, but tests by Boeing's engineers have shown that it causes more drag and therefore increases fuel consumption. Boeing has already been criticised by environmental groups for sacrificing efficiency for the sake of appearance. Lord Faulkner of Worcester, chairman of the Parliamentary Sustainable Aviation Group, has written to Sir Michael Jenkins, Boeing's UK president. In the letter, he accused Boeing of "deliberately and calculatedly manufacturing an aircraft with less than optimum fuel consumption". He added: "Do you not agree that we need new aircraft that reduce exhaust emissions to an absolute minimum if we are ever to get air transport's climate change contribution under control?" Jeff Hawk, Boeing's director of environment, said: "There is a trade- off in the design, in which we lose a little in terms of overall efficiency. We wanted people to recognise the plane so they could identify with the brand." But Randy Baseler, Boeing's head of marketing, said that the manufacturer would be prepared to reconsider the design if airlines raised concerns. "Airlines are saying to us, 'We want to bring back the magic of flight'. They want something recognisable, but we realise they don't want to pay a big fuel penalty for it," he said. "The tail is being studied very carefully and it could have some changes." Mr Baseler said that aspects of the Dreamliner's design, including extensive use of composite materials, would make it 20 per cent more efficient than existing airliners. Boeing also claims that the Dreamliner, which will have between 200 and 300 seats, will be more fuel-efficient than a 550-seat Airbus A380.
Empfohlene Beiträge
Archiviert
Dieses Thema ist jetzt archiviert und für weitere Antworten gesperrt.